Strong title, I know, but this word deserves it.
It may be an occupational thing, but this word manages to be insulting, misdescriptive, and misused by most people who employ it, all at the same time.
The word in question is "verbiage". If you mean to be dismissive or disparaging of somebody's prose style, by all means use it. It's pejorative, and that's what it's for. But for heaven's sake, don't use "verbiage" as an equivalent to "language" or "words". I even take issue with Merriam-Webster's definition to an extent - the first definition is fine, but contrary to the second definition "verbiage" shouldn't be just a synonym for "diction", as the etymology makes clear. It's not just expression, it's "chattering" or "trilling" pointlessly or confusingly.
As usual, Bryan Garner's book (the only reference book I use regularly) gets this right. The M-W second definition apparently also shows up in the Shorter OED but Garner calls it an "unneeded sense" (page 676 for those of you who want to look stuff like this up). So if you mean to criticize writing, or speech, that is prolix or redundant, use the word in good health. (Don't say "verbage", though. Geez.)
On the other hand, if you mean to dismiss something in writing because you don't think it's important, or you can't be bothered to read it, or you don't understand it and think it's irrelevant whether or not you do, then say those things and leave this word alone. In particular, if you want to apply it to some or all of a legal document, don't! If it's poorly written, opaque, redundant or jargon-filled, say so - you've got an excellent chance of being right. But dismissing large blocks of text because you've decided only lawyers would care about them just means the lawyers continue to win. Mwah hah hah hah!
Tuesday, August 26, 2008
Soccer
Hey everybody. What I am about to say is like a modern Cinderella story. My team in Clarkson Sheridan Soccer, the Red Spartans, were last place only four games into the season. But then we started a five game winning streak. And now just last week we went to the championship game. Although we lost the game it was a valiant effort. As I was in goal I played pretty well and the rest of the team played brilliantly even though we were playing against a team who was 13-1-0. The final score was 5-2.
Saturday, August 23, 2008
Like a stats textbook
The scatterplot below shows (from the Lahman Baseball Database) the numbers of career stolen bases for all of the 16,500+ players in the database, which tracks statistics for seasons through 2006. The career totals are sorted in descending order.
Two points: (i) the beauty of that curve is why people study sabermetrics in the first place; (ii) do you suppose Rickey Henderson is an outlier? He's that first dot.
Two points: (i) the beauty of that curve is why people study sabermetrics in the first place; (ii) do you suppose Rickey Henderson is an outlier? He's that first dot.
Saturday, August 16, 2008
Exciting News! Exotic New Breed
As some of you may know, our family adopted a dog from the North Bay Humane Society back in April of 2007. Happy as we were with our new friend, we quickly became tired of the constant demands to know his breed. Here in Southern Ontario, purebreds are a household requirement and "mixed breeds" treated with suspicion at the local dog parks. We tried the standard "He's a German Shepherd mix"; but that was nearly always followed with the next question: "Mixed with what?". "Idiot" didn't seem to satisfy most inquirers.
Happily, we heard about a way to determine the ancestry of our dear Jack. Sparing no expense, we quickly rushed out and had the test done.
Shock and delight soon followed when we learned that indeed, we had one of the world's only specimens of an extremely rare breed. The rare Icelandic Pukalikan (pronounced puke -a-leakin') combines a hardy love of cold weather with an endearingly neurotic personality that makes walking this Kennel Club star an exercise routine like no other.
We regret to announce, however, that we must disappoint all of you new Pukalikan fans in your quest for puppies since we had our friend "fixed" before we knew the potential value of this glorious breed. However, we invite you to stay tuned for updates as we uncover the hidden assets of the fabulous Pukalikan!
Wednesday, August 13, 2008
Pollution
It was a "road" day today, as it will be tomorrow, and it's been one of "those" weeks for the past two or three now. So, of interest was the claim on the back of a van advertising a local cleaning service. The service claimed it was capable of "cleaning the fabric of life". Obligatory plug. I had to giggle in the car. Although interestingly that claim doesn't seem to have made it to the website.
What a claim! A company that can clean the actual fabric of life. This one? Or this one? Or maybe this one?
Does this mean no more going to confession (for those Catholics among us)? No more going to the doctor? No further need for written codes of ethics, criminal codes or Kyoto accords? Just the all-in-one cleaning service.
Unfortunately, as someone working in the "social service industry", my experience would tell me that no matter how hard we try, human action and interaction, to say nothing of human inaction, tends to fall far short of the standard of perfection. Witness the previous post on the legal fall-out of the Toronto propane explosion. Witness the multi-faceted fallout of the Beijing Olympics . Witness the new mandate of the Ontario Human Rights Commission.
Maybe it's the multiplicity of catdom shedding into my keyboard, or just a bad couple of weeks, but I'm thinking that the best we can do is to learn to live gracefully with the stains in the "fabric of life". Save the bleach, pass the tie-dye. Sorry for the bummer post!
What a claim! A company that can clean the actual fabric of life. This one? Or this one? Or maybe this one?
Does this mean no more going to confession (for those Catholics among us)? No more going to the doctor? No further need for written codes of ethics, criminal codes or Kyoto accords? Just the all-in-one cleaning service.
Unfortunately, as someone working in the "social service industry", my experience would tell me that no matter how hard we try, human action and interaction, to say nothing of human inaction, tends to fall far short of the standard of perfection. Witness the previous post on the legal fall-out of the Toronto propane explosion. Witness the multi-faceted fallout of the Beijing Olympics . Witness the new mandate of the Ontario Human Rights Commission.
Maybe it's the multiplicity of catdom shedding into my keyboard, or just a bad couple of weeks, but I'm thinking that the best we can do is to learn to live gracefully with the stains in the "fabric of life". Save the bleach, pass the tie-dye. Sorry for the bummer post!
Propane and lawsuits
I was just listening to Prof. Garry Watson on CBC Radio very gently trying to explain that it might be a bit early to start talking about how class action lawsuits would proceed relating to the recent Toronto propane explosion.
The whole situation, obviously, is bad. It's tragic for the employee who was (apparently) killed in the explosion, and for the Toronto firefighter who died at the scene, albeit (apparently) of natural causes.
Isn't it amazing it wasn't worse? No other fatalities, no serious injuries, and what would appear to be full coverage by insurance with no resulting rate changes. And we don't yet know and may never know what exactly was the cause.
By the way, it turns out that there might be, oh, 337 propane facilities in the City of Toronto alone. Which arises from our demand for convenience of service - like nineteenth-century railroads, or natural gas piped to our houses, or power generating stations that nobody wants located close to their homes.
On the radio, the gentleman who is gathering signatures for the proposed class action suit said that "it was up to the lawyers" when asked who the defendants were going to be. That kind of sums it up, doesn't it? Since this must be someone's fault, a lawsuit is the obvious way to go, and questions of cause, who might be at fault for that cause, or whether there are in fact any uncompensated damages go by the boards.
The news cycle now is such that this aspect must get thrown in the hopper. It's long been the case that the litigation outlasts the attention to the thing that prompted it - but now I bet that the media will be done with this story before there's even any kind of report that should prompt someone to start thinking about a lawsuit.
Why do we want to rely on private legal remedies when (fairly obviously) the problem, if there is one, is public regulation or the lack of it? For convenience reasons, we ignore both the way facilities like this insinuate themselves everywhere and how (or if) they're regulated and inspected - until something like this happens and the handwringing commences.
The whole situation, obviously, is bad. It's tragic for the employee who was (apparently) killed in the explosion, and for the Toronto firefighter who died at the scene, albeit (apparently) of natural causes.
Isn't it amazing it wasn't worse? No other fatalities, no serious injuries, and what would appear to be full coverage by insurance with no resulting rate changes. And we don't yet know and may never know what exactly was the cause.
By the way, it turns out that there might be, oh, 337 propane facilities in the City of Toronto alone. Which arises from our demand for convenience of service - like nineteenth-century railroads, or natural gas piped to our houses, or power generating stations that nobody wants located close to their homes.
On the radio, the gentleman who is gathering signatures for the proposed class action suit said that "it was up to the lawyers" when asked who the defendants were going to be. That kind of sums it up, doesn't it? Since this must be someone's fault, a lawsuit is the obvious way to go, and questions of cause, who might be at fault for that cause, or whether there are in fact any uncompensated damages go by the boards.
The news cycle now is such that this aspect must get thrown in the hopper. It's long been the case that the litigation outlasts the attention to the thing that prompted it - but now I bet that the media will be done with this story before there's even any kind of report that should prompt someone to start thinking about a lawsuit.
Why do we want to rely on private legal remedies when (fairly obviously) the problem, if there is one, is public regulation or the lack of it? For convenience reasons, we ignore both the way facilities like this insinuate themselves everywhere and how (or if) they're regulated and inspected - until something like this happens and the handwringing commences.
Friday, August 8, 2008
The Judges Have Spoken....
And the winner is.....
Iron Chef Flay.
However, I understand that SOMEONE may have stacked the ballot box. Tsk Tsk. Is that the way democracy works?
Iron Chef Flay.
However, I understand that SOMEONE may have stacked the ballot box. Tsk Tsk. Is that the way democracy works?
Saturday, August 2, 2008
Summer baseball reading
My vacation reading this summer included two baseball books (and some others which I hope to write on later).
The first (and the one I'd most strongly recommend) is Henry Thomas's biography of Walter Johnson, Walter Johnson: Baseball's Big Train. This is the work of Johnson's grandson, written in 1998. It is thorough, very well-researched, and exceptionally well-written. Imagine a current sports figure whose biography features no scandals, and essentially no one ready to say a bad thing about the subject! The story of the famous 1924 season (in which the Washington Senators, a miserable team for nearly Johnson's whole career, finally won the World Series) is very affecting. I also discovered that, unlike most successful baseball players, he was probably a better manager than generally given credit for. Anybody who's interested in the early era of professional baseball and particularly the transition to the Babe Ruth years will enjoy this book.
More of a historical curiosity, but a book I'd always meant to read, is Pitching in a Pinch. This 1912 book was purportedly written by New York Giant great Christy Mathewson but really ghostwritten by sportswriter John N. Wheeler, and the latter's introduction to the book doesn't show much of an effort to deviate from "Christy's" style in the rest of the book. It's still interesting but mostly now for students of baseball history or those very keen on the era. Three things about the book jumped out at me as unusual:
- how many contemporary books of the type will include a whole section on umpires?
- where else are you going to find out the proper use of the term "bullyragging"?
- imagine a book whose point (other than to merchandise the nominal author, but in a gentle early 20th century kind of way) is to suggest that pitching success might flow from strength of character!
All in all, very enjoyable, but not profound and not rigorous - think of it as high-class advertising.
The first (and the one I'd most strongly recommend) is Henry Thomas's biography of Walter Johnson, Walter Johnson: Baseball's Big Train. This is the work of Johnson's grandson, written in 1998. It is thorough, very well-researched, and exceptionally well-written. Imagine a current sports figure whose biography features no scandals, and essentially no one ready to say a bad thing about the subject! The story of the famous 1924 season (in which the Washington Senators, a miserable team for nearly Johnson's whole career, finally won the World Series) is very affecting. I also discovered that, unlike most successful baseball players, he was probably a better manager than generally given credit for. Anybody who's interested in the early era of professional baseball and particularly the transition to the Babe Ruth years will enjoy this book.
More of a historical curiosity, but a book I'd always meant to read, is Pitching in a Pinch. This 1912 book was purportedly written by New York Giant great Christy Mathewson but really ghostwritten by sportswriter John N. Wheeler, and the latter's introduction to the book doesn't show much of an effort to deviate from "Christy's" style in the rest of the book. It's still interesting but mostly now for students of baseball history or those very keen on the era. Three things about the book jumped out at me as unusual:
- how many contemporary books of the type will include a whole section on umpires?
- where else are you going to find out the proper use of the term "bullyragging"?
- imagine a book whose point (other than to merchandise the nominal author, but in a gentle early 20th century kind of way) is to suggest that pitching success might flow from strength of character!
All in all, very enjoyable, but not profound and not rigorous - think of it as high-class advertising.
Friday, August 1, 2008
What about Jason Bay?
I feel sorry for good ol' Canadian Jason Bay who has now been traded from the Pirates to the Red Sox. Yes, he's got a lot better chance of seeing October baseball where he's going, but he hasn't seen anything like the pressure or wall-to-wall press coverage that he's about to experience - especially replacing Manny in Fenway's left field.
So how's he likely to stack up? Well, respectably, but probably not well enough to keep the fans and scribes happy. Let's look at a few numbers and compare them (statistics derived from the numbers at the incomparable baseball-reference.com; full file on request).
BA / OBP / SLG
Jason Bay, first 5 seasons (616 games)
.281 / .375 / .515
Manny Ramirez, first 5 seasons (552 games)
.304 / .393 / .546
Jason Bay, ages 24-28 (same as above)
.281 / .375 / .515
Manny Ramirez, ages 24-28 (717 games)
.322 / .416 / .611
Jason Bay, last three seasons (incl. 2008 to date, 410 games)
.271 / .367 / .488
Manny Ramirez, last three seasons (incl. 2008 to date, 363 games)
.305 / .409 / .547
At this point in his career, Jason ought to be more durable, he hits into fewer double plays, and he's certainly more of a threat on the base paths. However, he walks less and strikes out more (though maybe being in a better lineup will help there). That difference of nearly one hundred points in the age 24-28 slugging percentage is a bit scary - even though he played 101 games more, Manny had nearly 500 more total bases (1616 vs. 1135).
I hope Jason Bay can continue his drive toward Canadian baseball immortality, but I'm not sure this particular move does him that much good. He'd look good in that Jays lineup, though....
*** Update: Jason was the hero with a 12th-inning triple off the Monster; while the Jays managed to blow 6-0 and 8-6 leads (the latter in the ninth with their ace reliever on the mound) to lose 9-8. ***
So how's he likely to stack up? Well, respectably, but probably not well enough to keep the fans and scribes happy. Let's look at a few numbers and compare them (statistics derived from the numbers at the incomparable baseball-reference.com; full file on request).
BA / OBP / SLG
Jason Bay, first 5 seasons (616 games)
.281 / .375 / .515
Manny Ramirez, first 5 seasons (552 games)
.304 / .393 / .546
Jason Bay, ages 24-28 (same as above)
.281 / .375 / .515
Manny Ramirez, ages 24-28 (717 games)
.322 / .416 / .611
Jason Bay, last three seasons (incl. 2008 to date, 410 games)
.271 / .367 / .488
Manny Ramirez, last three seasons (incl. 2008 to date, 363 games)
.305 / .409 / .547
At this point in his career, Jason ought to be more durable, he hits into fewer double plays, and he's certainly more of a threat on the base paths. However, he walks less and strikes out more (though maybe being in a better lineup will help there). That difference of nearly one hundred points in the age 24-28 slugging percentage is a bit scary - even though he played 101 games more, Manny had nearly 500 more total bases (1616 vs. 1135).
I hope Jason Bay can continue his drive toward Canadian baseball immortality, but I'm not sure this particular move does him that much good. He'd look good in that Jays lineup, though....
*** Update: Jason was the hero with a 12th-inning triple off the Monster; while the Jays managed to blow 6-0 and 8-6 leads (the latter in the ninth with their ace reliever on the mound) to lose 9-8. ***
*** Further update: as of the games of September 6, Jason was .302 / .359 / .500 in 31 games for the Sox; Manny was .403 / .500 / .748 in 34 games for the Dodgers. Whoa. ***
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
